A standardized treatment protocol for pilonidal disease can influence the health mindset of adolescents.

PURPOSE: Pilonidal disease (PD) significantly impacts patients' quality of life and requires regular maintenance behaviors to achieve cure. Health mindset is a psychological construct which can influence health behaviors and outcomes, with a growth mindset being associated with better outcomes than a fixed. We propose that participation in a standardized treatment protocol can affect the health mindset for adolescents with pilonidal disease. METHODS: PD patients' demographics, recurrence, and comorbidities were prospectively collected from 2019 to 2022. We assessed patients' mindset score at initial presentation using the validated Three-Item Mindset Scale (1-6) then reassessed during follow-up. t-test was used to compare baseline and follow-up mindset scores and stratified by recurrence or comorbidities. p ≤ 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: A total of 207 PD patients (108 males, 99 females) with mean age 18.2 ± 3.7 years were followed for 351 ± 327 days. Mean baseline mindset score (4.76 ± 1.27) was significantly lower than mean follow-up mindset score (5.03 ± 1.18, p = 0.049). Baseline mindset score was significantly lower among patients with PD recurrence (4.00 ± 0.66) compared to those without recurrence (4.8 ± 1.29, p = 0.05). Among patients with PD recurrence, mean baseline mindset score (4.00 ± 0.66) was significantly lower than mean follow-up mindset score (5.27 ± 0.93, p = 0.0038). Patient comorbidity did not affect the baseline or follow-up mindset score. CONCLUSIONS: Participation in a standardized treatment protocol is associated with the development of a stronger growth mindset over time for patients with PD. Furthermore, a growth mindset was linked to lower recurrence rate than a fixed mindset. Further investigations into how treatment approaches can work in concert with health mindset are proposed.

Regular epilation alone is an acceptable treatment for symptom-free pilonidal patients.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with mild pilonidal disease often experience symptom resolution without excision. We hypothesized that treating symptom-free/asymptomatic pilonidal patients with regular epilation alone had similar recurrence rate as patients who were also treated surgically. METHOD: Patient data were prospectively collected 2/2019-11/2022 at our Pilonidal Clinic. All patients received regular epilation; all patients presented before 12/2020 also underwent pit excision using trephines. Starting 1/2021, only symptomatic patients underwent pit excision; symptom-free patients at presentation received only regular epilation. Recurrence rates were statistically analyzed. RESULTS: 255 patients (male:54.4%, female:45.6%), median age 17.3years (IQR:15.8-19.1) were followed for median 612.5days (IQR:367.5-847). 44.1% identified as Hispanic, 36.5% Caucasian, 17.1% Asian, 2.4% Black. Median symptom duration at presentation was 180.5days (IQR:44.5-542.5). 160 patients were initially treated with surgical excision and regular epilation, while 95 patients with regular epilation only. The failure rate between patients who received surgical excision initially and recurred (9.4%) and patients who received epilation only and recurred (12.6%) was similar, after controlling for sex, race, age, comorbidities, skin type, hair color, hair thickness (p > 0.05). Patients who recurred after only undergoing regular epilation all underwent surgical excision, median 100days (IQR:59.5-123.5) after initial presentation. CONCLUSION: Regular epilation alone is an acceptable treatment for symptom-free pilonidal patients.

Time from first clinical contact to abortion in Texas and California.

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether having an abortion in Texas, a U.S. state with many restrictive abortion laws, is associated with increased time between contacting an abortion provider and receiving an abortion, compared to having an abortion in California, a less restrictive U.S. state. STUDY DESIGN: This is a multisite, cross-sectional survey of 434 patients in 12 abortion facilities (ambulatory surgical centers and clinics) in Texas (n = 291) and three abortion clinics in California (n = 143) from 2018 to 2019. At 11 facilities in Texas the response rate was 76%. The response rate was not collected at other sites. We compare the clinical-contact-to-abortion time interval between the facilities in these two states using mixed-effects multivariable logistic regression, adjusting for age, race, education, household income, parity, marital status, and insurance status. We also compare barriers to scheduling and traveling to abortion appointments. RESULTS: Median clinical-contact-to-abortion time is similar among respondents in Texas and California [(9 vs 8 days, p = 0.86). The odds of having a clinical-contact-to-abortion time ≥7 days is similar among respondents in Texas compared to California (adjusted odds ratio 1.0 (95% confidence interval, 0.4-2.6, p = 0.98). Respondents in Texas travel farther for their abortion (mean 22.1 vs 13.5 miles, p < 0.01), are more likely to sell something of value or delay paying another expense to pay for their abortion (49.7% vs 11.4%, p < 0.01), and to miss work to attend their abortion (73.9% vs 61.3%, p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we found no difference in clinical-contact-to-abortion time between respondents in Texas and those in California. Respondents in Texas, however, face other significant barriers in obtaining abortion care, which result in life disruptions and financial hardship. IMPLICATIONS: Patients face greater financial barriers when seeking abortion in Texas compared to California. Though we found no significant difference in clinical-contact-to-abortion time in this sample between the two states, clinical-contact-to-abortion time may be a useful measure of facility congestion and the obstacles patients face obtaining abortion care.

Understanding quality of contraceptive services from women's perspectives in Gujarat, India: a focus group study.

OBJECTIVES: Understanding quality of contraceptive care from clients' perspectives is critical to ensuring acceptable and non-harmful services, yet little qualitative research has been dedicated to this topic. India's history of using incentives to promote contraceptive use, combined with reports of unsafe conditions in sterilisation camps, make a focus on quality important. The study objective was to understand women's experiences with and preferences for contraceptive counselling and care in the public sector in India. DESIGN: Qualitative study using eight focus group discussions (FGDs). FGDs were thematically analysed using a framework approach. SETTING: Rural and urban areas in one district in Gujarat. PARTICIPANTS: 31 sterilisation and 42 reversible contraceptive users who were married and represented different backgrounds. Inclusion criteria were: (1) female, (2) at least 18 years and (3) receipt of contraception services in the last 6 months from public health services. RESULTS: Providers motivate married women to use contraception and guide women to specific methods based on how many children they have. Participants found this common practice acceptable. Participants also discussed the lack of counselling about reversible and permanent options and expressed a need for more information on side effects of reversible methods. There were mixed opinions about whether compensation received for accepting long-term methods affects contraceptive decision making. While many women were satisfied with their experiences, we identified minor themes related to provider coercion towards provider-controlled methods and disrespectful and abusive treatment during sterilisation care, both of which require concerted efforts to address systemic factors enabling such experiences. CONCLUSIONS: Findings illuminate opportunities for quality improvement as we identified several gaps between how women experience contraceptive care and their preferences, and with ideals of quality and rights frameworks. Findings informed adaptation of the Quality of Contraceptive Counselling Scale for India, and have implications for centring quality and rights in global efforts.

Impact of the 12-lead electrocardiogram on ED evaluation and management.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to assess the impact (diagnostic, therapeutic, and disposition) of the 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) on emergency department (ED) patient evaluation and management. METHODS: This project was a prospective study of a convenience sample of 304 ED patients undergoing ECG analysis during their evaluation in the ED of a level 1 trauma center. The data collection for this study was divided into 4 parts. In part I, the treating physicians determined the specific reasons for ECG analysis; categories include complaint-based (eg, chest pain), syndrome-based (eg, overdose/poisoning), and system-based (eg, "requested by consult"). In part II, all treating physicians were surveyed before ECG interpretation regarding the future diagnostic, therapeutic, and disposition plans for the patient based only on history and physical examination. Their comments were recorded on a standardized data sheet. In part III, the physicians were surveyed after their interpretation of the ECG as to whether the results could suggest any further diagnostic information (eg, normal vs abnormal), or provide enough information for the patient care plan to be altered. In part IV of the study period, alterations to the original diagnostic, therapeutic, and disposition plans made by information provided by the ECG were obtained from the treating physician. RESULTS: A total of 304 patients underwent ECG examination and were used for data analysis. The average age of patients, of which 48% were men, was 60 years. The most common complaints that prompted electrocardiographic evaluation were chest pain and dyspnea. The most common reason an ECG was ordered was nursing staff protocol. Physicians determined that they were able to make a diagnosis based primarily on ECG in 33 (10.9%) cases. The total number of ECGs that were determined to be normal was 95 (31.3%), 7 (2.3%) of which allowed a rule-out diagnosis; 209 (68.7%) of total ECGs were determined to be abnormal, 72 (23.6%) of which were considered "of diagnostic significance." In 96 (31.6%) cases of electrocardiographic interpretation, alterations were made to the diagnostic, therapeutic, or disposition plans because of the information provided by the ECG. CONCLUSIONS: The ECG provides clinical information that frequently alters the management plan.